![]() Protective factors specified in the SDM appear to reduce violence in late adolescence even among youth from low SES families and youth exposed to high levels of cumulative risk.Īt-risk youth Protective factors developmental predictors longitudinal study violence. This difference was not observed between youth from higher and lower SES families. Importantly, protective factors had a greater effect in reducing violence among youth exposed to high levels of cumulative risk than among youth exposed to lower levels of cumulative risk. Although risk exposure increased the odds of violence, protective factors in middle adolescence predicted lower odds of violence during late adolescence. Higher levels of protective factors in early and middle adolescence reduced the odds of violence during late adolescence in the full sample and in two different risk groups (high cumulative risk and low SES). Results / Accomplishments The impact of this program was evaluated at multiple time periods, including evaluations while the intervention was ongoing (at ages 7, 8, and 10), soon after the end of the intervention (age 13), and at six- nine- twelve- and fifteen-year follow-ups (ages 18, 21, 24 and 27). This paper uses data from participants' adolescent years, ages 10-18. A community sample of 808 participants from the Seattle Public School District was surveyed from the 5th grade through adulthood. This paper examined proximal and distal effects of protective factors specified in the social development model (SDM) on youth violence among high-risk youth.ĭata come from the Seattle Social Development Project, a longitudinal study of development from childhood into adulthood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |